Thank you for that question.
You're right. The four contentious issues were the delegation of authority, the binding policy direction, the fixed assessment guidelines, and the projects that had been previously screened with minor changes not requiring reassessment. If we had to pick from them, we feel that the ability for binding policy direction for the designated offices is critical because of the disconnect between YESAB and the designated offices. As well, the reassessment piece would be important for our members.
Many of our miners are multi-generational and many are still mining in the same place they were 15 or even 20 years ago, so they've been through two or three or four assessments with no change in the overall scope of the project.
Hopefully that answers your question.