At the current time, mining companies would absolutely be stupid not to engage indigenous communities. We all know that the legal landscape has been confirmed, and that beyond the regulatory duty to consult there is fast becoming a business rationale to proactively engage indigenous communities. At this time it may be out of the government's control to monitor these bad apples. In reality, the government can only do so much. The regulatory system needs to find the right balance between environment, community input, and the economic benefits created by mining. Federal government investments to support indigenous training have been greatly appreciated and have shown success.
In my experience, and that of Des Nedhe, the province and territorial governments placed percentages around hiring and business contracting spend, which the mining companies needed to meet as part of the permits. Is this the way to go? I would argue that many of the successes we see are because government placed a percentage target on resource companies.
Investment in northern Canada is a must. Yes, it does cost more to build remote infrastructure such as roads, communication, and housing. Yes, the population is small and dispersed compared to southern Canada, but Canada's untapped wealth is located in these remote regions. It is also the home to many indigenous people. This investment would support both the community's needs but also may lower the initial cost to mineral development. If done correctly, it is key that we get this right, as the value created will not only benefit those local to the mining development; it will also add value to Canadians from coast to coast to coast.
Thank you.