I can tell you that there is a vocal minority that does not necessarily agree with the way we take decisions, but anybody who ever had any opinion about nuclear, about our facilities, or about a hearing, appears in front of us, and we have an informed discussion that feeds into our decision.
Internally, I want to get into the anonymous letter. You should know that we get all kinds of letters. Some of them are anonymous and some of them are on the record. Some of them originate internally and some of them externally. You have the licencee employees who write letters to us in confidence. We have a process in place. No matter who writes the letter, we have a responsibility to do due diligence to make sure the letter does not raise legitimate concerns.
If somebody writes me a letter saying we didn't do A, B, and C, right away we have to make sure that safety was not compromised. That's why you don't go into some external, lengthy kind of thing. We have to do an internal review very quickly to make the commissioners accept that no safety was compromised. That's why we did it, and why we did it internally.
Some of the press picked up on the fact that I gave my employees, my staff, the opportunity to say whether they actually knew where it came from. If people looked at it as a joke, it was nothing like a joke. It was actually a hearing in the public, by the way, for our staff to explain whether there was any safety issue in this particular letter.