Thank you.
I touched on this a little bit in my statements in the last question: land-use planning. I find this is an interesting one that is not really touched upon, so I'm wondering if you could talk about this at all.
Again in Pickering, not only do we host the nuclear facility but we were selected by the province as one of their places to grow, which meant intensifying our downtown, increasing our population. Our nuclear facility is extremely close to our downtown and the rationale, when residents raised concerns about intensification in this area, was, “Well, it's decommissioning”. Then the province talks about extending the licence, and we say, “But what about that land-use planning rationale?”
Again, it's these silos, right? When you're talking about social licence and talking about getting the public involved, I was on council for 10 years, as I said, and we didn't have the universities, we didn't have the scientists, necessarily, at the table. Is there an opportunity, when you look at planning, because you really can't build nuclear facilities without truly understanding what that neighbourhood's going to look like in 10, 15, 20, or 30 years?