Okay. Your point is that the government tried to reduce the liability or the burden on the AECL.
Then I come to a question about the GOCO model you just mentioned in your presentation. I asked a similar question before to the government about this GOCO model. The nuclear industry is very special because nuclear safety always has a high priority. Before the government can emphasize nuclear safety, no matter how much, and even pay money or put more people working under this GOCO model.... I don't know how the government can judge the performance of the contractors. They can save money, but perhaps they have to sacrifice nuclear safety. If they maintain nuclear safety, probably they have to pay more money, and then it's against the purpose of the government. Maybe there is something that I don't understand. Maybe you can comment more on that.