It's going to be more than just first nations who put up the opposition to that. In Ontario we had a low nuclear piece of equipment that was going to be decommissioned, and it ended up they couldn't even transport it across the Great Lakes. I think you have a huge lot of work to do there.
If the business case could be made to reuse the spent fuel rods in a new type of reactor—you mentioned New Brunswick Power Corporation would consider using that technology instead of shipping so-called hot nuclear material across the country and burying it out of sight and out of mind—if the requirement were not there, and we did have the technology to reuse this fuel and in the process get rid of all the other parts, the by-products that last for years and years, would you see the logic in taking some of the money that's being dedicated to the DGR and instead using it to develop the technology that is going to be required to reuse that spent fuel?