I understand.
Other methods have been looked at. We've looked at whether we could solidify the material and put together a facility at the site and deal with it ourselves. First of all, the cost is much higher, but of course safety is always number one, so if it is going to cost far more, it would also be much safer, so that would probably be the right answer.
The reality is that shipping material, even liquid material, is done all around the world. It's happening right now, and we do it extremely safely. As a matter of fact, we have the safest record for transport of nuclear material. These containers and the processes we use are regulated and approved by our CNSC, one of the best regulators in the world. They take a hard look at this, as does NRC, and these have been approved by both and by the U.S. Department of Transportation as well.
Looking at how high our standards are and seeing that they meet all those standards, I think that to move the material is the right approach to take. It's also great that it's in one location, that it's consolidated right now at a facility in the U.S. that is already protecting this kind of material and processing it and that has better experience.
I think it's better that we do it this way rather than try to reinvent the wheel.