Yes. I very much appreciate the question, because it gives me a chance to speak about the different approach that we're embarking on. We're very much looking at a whole-of-government solution.
I don't want to be critical of my predecessors, but historically we have tended to look at it at each stage. As you correctly pointed out, however, it's the same companies that have to carry on all the way to the finished product. We think that having a sense of accompaniment with them, so that they can move from R and D to a demo, to proper financing, and to eventually getting a product to the marketplace is really important. We're looking to act very much in the spirit of that single window, with whole-of-government support wherein we have multiple agencies co-located in a given spot, so that we can help firms move along the way.
We recognize that not all of those great ideas will end up being adopted. Here I think we have to be straight with ourselves and have a bit of a stricter gating process so that if an idea, especially on the breakthrough side, doesn't pan out or work out, we have the guts to pull the plug on it so that we don't commit more taxpayer dollars to something that won't achieve its stated goal. For those ideas that have legs, we have to assist and support them along the way. Finding the sweet spot between the two is what we're striving for.