I can give you a quick explanation of that.
When Alberta did the methane regulations, the innovators who are now helping to mitigate methane in the U.S., as an example, were not invited to the regulatory consultations. We established a methane regulation target that did not account for innovation.
Oddly enough, in the U.S., civil society makes that happen. The ENGOs make sure of it, and we have examples. For example, in natural gas being used for middle-distance heavy trucking, civil society, which is the Environmental Defense Fund in the U.S., sat down with a technology provider and made them prove their figures for emissions, for costs, etc. That technology is part of the road map for emissions reductions in transportation in the U.S. It's all based on science, on proof, and it's all done transparently.
We don't do that in Canada. When we do methane regulation reviews, we don't have the innovators or the scientists at the table to say, “Well, you know, we don't need to use the methodology that we've used for 25 years. We can use a different one. It's more cost-effective, and we'll get more methane abatement.”