To clarify, it's only a portion of those two tax credits that it doesn't qualify for. Within the ACCA transmission expenses, from speaking to persons at Natural Resources Canada, it's because the original Meager Creek test facility in southern British Columbia was too far to load, and that scared off the government from wanting to become a transmission company, paying for 200 or 300 kilometres of transmission. That is now not the case. In fact we're proposing that a lot of geothermal development can happen in communities, adjacent to communities, with minimal transmission distances because a valuable product is the heat, and you can't send that 200 kilometres.
The wind-powered test facility of the wind power industry did the legwork, and they told the government, Natural Resources Canada, why they needed it. They were excellent lobbyers and they got there first. They have to prospect an uncertain resource. They were able to demonstrate that the ability to claim their test equipment would materially benefit their industry. Now geothermal is making the same case. We have an uncertain resource. It's three kilometres beneath the surface. Just as we don't know when the wind blows, we don't know exactly how hot a reservoir is or how well it flows until we do it.