We really need to focus on the usable capacity we're going to get for the investment. As I mentioned in my introductory remarks, the existing facilities don't operate anywhere near their design capabilities. The very first things we should be looking at are investments that could be made that could bring that capacity back up to get another 300 megawatts, maybe 400 megawatts, on those existing facilities, at far less money than what new facilities would cost.
Then, when we start talking about the new facilities, again we have to be cognizant that electricity is a tricky commodity. There are a lot of interactions with how electricity flows over the grid. In designing the interties, there are ways that you can put in facilities that don't get you very much transfer capability, and then there are ways we can put in facilities that will get us much more.
I gave the example in my talk about when Alberta was connected to Montana. The design choices that were made ended up not changing Alberta's overall ability to bring electricity in, but just allocated capacity that was already there with B.C. over to Montana. If we were to build a new link between B.C. and Alberta, we'd want to minimize the amount of capacity that would ultimately get bled out among all the existing facilities and try to create as much incremental capacity as possible.
In getting to the next piece, the incentives, I'll turn it over to Mr. Bechard, in terms of what would be necessary to support that investment.