Starting with the middle of the three-part question, I would say, yes, Canada has a substantial amount of biomass that is not being used today. In my remarks I focused on waste and residues. That's where in particular we think there's an enormous amount of opportunity. We would still suggest that lumber is a higher use for a tree than biofuel, but the waste can be better used as biofuel than left rotting in the forest.
To your first point, absolutely, it's win-win with the Scandinavians in the sense that we're both highly advanced countries, and we have similar but different forests. They're similar in the sense that we both have Norway spruce and similar species of trees. We have quite different approaches to forestry in the sense that they have much more intensive forestry.