I would say that other than making construction lumber, wood buildings, or tall wood buildings, this is an excellent technology to develop. It's not necessarily where we are. In terms of the programs, our main concern is the availability under the envelopes that are awarded in the budgeting process. I don't know the exact numbers—you might know them more than I do—but I understand that, for example in the latest IFIT round, the proposals that were received were tenfold more than the available budget. That's our main concern. We think not only our projects, but most certainly those of others as well, are probably worthy of receiving funds. The IFIT process, the way we see it, is very rigorous. There are expert panels. I think it is a risky business to invest in start-up technologies and first deployments. The government is getting its money's worth to the extent it has the right process to evaluate those projects. It's a matter of expanding the envelopes, primarily.
On January 30th, 2018. See this statement in context.