Again, I think one of the keys—and the government has done a pretty good job at it to date—is supporting universities and research institutions to create new innovation. We are a licensee of technology, so we created the company—and that's not the single premise of our company. I should note. We are a licensee of technology that was created by FPInnovations.
We chose that technology because we thought it was very commercial ready. It got to that stage based on support from government. We took that technology, and now we've accelerated it even further. I would say that we're now pre-commercial, if not commercial, in certain applications.
Additional support is going to come in, since we're not just relying as a company on this one particular piece of technology or material to take us all the way to becoming a very large, successful company. We're also trying to fill our pipeline with additional technologies and innovations, whether we create them ourselves or we license them in. We're constantly seeking new innovations and new researchers.
Often, we bring ideas to universities and researchers where, since we're much more exposed to the market and commercialization than a professor in a laboratory, we think we know what industry needs a little bit more of than perhaps a professor. We bring ideas to professors and we sometimes get them very excited about working with us in certain areas.
Supporting the innovation pipeline and giving companies, such as ours, opportunities basically to pick and choose what we would believe to be very successful near-term opportunities for taking something from lab scale, and then into the pre-commercial and commercial scales is something the government can continue to support.