A biodesign cluster still exists, by the way. It was an initiative of FPAC; Bioindustrial Innovation Canada, which is located in Sarnia and has done a good job of building a bioeconomy complex there, I would say; Genome Canada; and FPinnovations. The idea was that they brought together a number of companies that are in the bioeconomy supply chain. Many of them are in the forest sector. I think I said there were over 70 of them, and they included major forest products companies like Resolute.
Antoine, I hope you don't mind my saying that CelluForce was involved in the initiative as well.
It tied together the entire value chain, and the idea was that it could be a supercluster, although it would be a somewhat dispersed supercluster. That organization put together an application to the ISED supercluster program, and unfortunately they weren't successful. They still exist and still have an interest in trying to string that together. My point in talking about them was that it's an excellent opportunity to enable that value chain collaboration, the example I described of the Canadian university going down the wrong path with the adhesive formulation. Our experience is that that's not the exception. That happens a lot, and it happens because of a lack of industrial guidance, and the biodesign supercluster is a way this could be corrected.
I should just clarify that they're not a client of ours. We were a supporting organization saying that this was a good idea, but I'm not a client.