For the most part, yes. I guess what I'm trying to get at, and what we saw with the witnesses, is the fact that the industry is heavily subsidized and this is, again, as I pointed out, not Liberal versus Conservative or what have you, because a lot of the subsidies were in the previous Parliament too. What we're looking at are better ways, but also in this, in my opinion, the government should be enhancing our freedoms, not controlling our behaviour through the tax code or distributing wealth in a way that puts one sector at a severe disadvantage. We are noticing that with these products if there is a market for them, the market will pay for them. However, we don't want the oil and gas industry to be negatively affected as a result of some of these decisions because there are thousands upon thousands of jobs that depend on this.
However, if the market does move in a direction to replace some of these products, as you pointed out, that would be fine. I'm more curious about how much the government subsidized it because with this type of thing, of course, companies are going to be very happy with this. If a company can say, the government will help me in my research, that's a cost I do not have to incur, and that is a cost I do not have to roll into the price of my product on the other side of things, and which affects the price.
Is there anything else you want to add? That's what I was getting at.