As I see it now, if wood wants to compete, which it is, it has to get up to the level of, or exceed, what concrete and steel are doing, and it has done that. That's a good thing. I think if you have the choice and people are making the decision on which mode of construction to go with, they can make that decision based on the information available, whether it's energy efficiency in the long run or they want to be a better partner to the environment, that kind of thing. They'll make those decisions. My concern is that we're picking winners and losers and we may be tipping the scales a bit. That's where I have a bit of a problem. With respect to the wording, as Mr. Falk pointed out in his line of questioning, the word “preference” was in there, and I think it almost does that.
I don't know if anyone wants to respond or if Mr. Falk has anything to say, but I have a few minutes left and I'll cede the floor to Mr. Cannings if no one else has anything.