I think both the provinces and the federal government do infrastructure, so if you're talking about procurement.... We've often talked on the committee about how government procurement can help different sectors at certain times of their development.
Just to get back to your first question about compelling a private sector company—and I forget exactly what the question was—this is not compelling the government to buy from a certain company or anything. It's just that if we are doing infrastructure, let's put that project to a couple of tests. First, what would be the best buy for our dollars and cents over the lifetime of that project? Second, what aspect of the project would lower the carbon footprint? I haven't specified in the bill how that balance would be made. Normally, we would just look at the costs. I've added the carbon footprint and said that we should show a preference for wood. In that, I'm implying that if it comes out more or less equal, then we should use wood because it will also do those other things I mentioned.