The very first part of the proposed legislation focuses on the awarding of contracts.
I've heard a lot of people say that a great benefit to wood would be building codes and standards. Maybe RFQ requirement statements that are proposed by the ministry for a particular design or construction is a stage at which, if we demonstrated a requirement for wood and the means by which wood could be or should be required, it maybe would prevent a view that we're going to look at it at the contract award stage. That's when the lawyers in the room are thinking they might be able to make some money.
I know for wood guys for every problem the solution might be a hammer. I'm wondering what your thoughts are if instead of focusing on contract award we focused on the requirements. Would that meet your industry's needs? Would it be better balanced for equality? Do you think that would be within the spirit of the bill? Our changes need to be within the spirit of the bill.