Thank you for those proposed amendments. I think we'll end up on the same page, and I'll tell you why.
Section 7 is the preceding section to where this amendment comes in. In paragraphs 7(1) (a) to (d), you have there in legislation already considerations that in the course and duty of procurement the minister has to consider cost, performance, availability, and safety. When you read the language in (c), where the minister has to consider and assure the quality of the material, the maintenance, and specifications and standards, that actually encompasses all of those things. So in our view what you're suggesting is already in legislation and it's not necessary. Therefore the amendment that we are putting forward achieves the objective of the legislation, which is to provide a consideration and a support for wood as a material. Also with the amendment, it considers the testimonies we've heard and the argument I laid out earlier around why those amendments would make this a stronger piece of legislation that considers what we've heard.