No. As I was just saying in my examples for electricity, all our provinces are working in silos. Quebec is planning for Quebec. Ontario is planning for Ontario. New Brunswick is planning for New Brunswick. Of course, when you look only at one province, you don't have the economies of scale that you could have if you were planning for more provinces and if you were looking at, more generally, what happens.
Look at what Alberta is doing right now. Alberta wants to introduce a lot of wind into its electricity sector. It wants to displace coal, have natural gas, and invest in a lot of wind. At the same time, B.C. is struggling with its Site C hydro project. At no point have there been discussions or joint planning to see if Site C for hydro development in B.C. could be useful for wind penetration in Alberta. Wind and hydro are complements because when the wind doesn't blow, you can use hydro. That's just an illustration of how maybe Site C is not justified on a purely B.C. basis. If it were planned jointly with Alberta, then wind in Alberta would make more sense because it wouldn't fluctuate as much, but could be balanced with the hydro in B.C. Has Alberta gone to B.C. to do joint planning? Very little.
It's the same thing with Manitoba and Saskatchewan. They could and they should have joint planning for their hydro systems, but they have two separate hydro systems. Again, all across Canada there's a lack of joint planning that is actually extremely harmful because we have projects that are not optimal, and ultimately, consumers will pay more for these projects.