No. That would be a great question to analyze, because the Ontario Medical Association was the leading organization that had analyzed the health effects in Ontario of the coal use and the number of deaths that were happening with those smog days. That's a great question to follow up, about the low-income component of that.
We do know that low-income families, and consumers generally, who have less access to air conditioning often have poor indoor air generally. We do need to watch out as we're working on retrofits and tightening up buildings that we pay attention to things like indoor air quality. This is another issue my organization works on: making sure we're still dealing with radon ventilation and not increasing that source of lung cancer, not increasing tight buildings and having mould as a result, and those kinds of things. These are very intersectional problems.
The City of Toronto, for example, has been working on heat island effects—even since the coal phase-out, we still have hot days here—and working on a bylaw that would ask landlords to make sure units are never more than a certain temperature during the day. Unfortunately, we sometimes do see heat-related deaths from those high-rise buildings.
It's a very intersectional problem and a good one that would be good to ask about the coal phase-out.