In the U.S., there was one specific assessment in the context of the Colorado roadless rule. It was about a mine. There were court cases around it. The court rejected the initial assessment. The second assessment that was done included the social cost of carbon in it and was a much more robust and very detailed analysis. When they look at jobs, they don't just say there are 15 jobs for two years. They actually look at the long-term effect of those jobs and whether people in the area would have other jobs.
That assessment was way more detailed than what we can do.