They buy softwood lumber from softwood lumber producers and then add value to that product to, perhaps, make bed-frames or wood pallets, which are then exported to the United States. The situation, as I understand it, is that the duty applied to the remanufacturers is on the softwood lumber product itself as well as on the value added and the profit, so they end up with the same 20.23% tariff. It's higher for them because of the value added to their product.
This has been a difficult issue. The Department of Commerce has had different views on this and has applied or not applied tariffs to the value-added portion of remanufacturers for some time. Unfortunately, in the latest dispute, they are applying that to remanufacturers, which is very harmful to the remanufacturers.
One way we can move this forward is through the litigation that we're doing, which we hope will remove the duties at the anti-dumping and the countervailing duties. There are also processes under the United States Court of International Trade, which can reduce the scope of the application of the duties. For example, the Shake and Shingle Alliance has had some success in going to the U.S. Court of International Trade to reduce the scope, to remove shakes and shingles. Also, the remanufacturers themselves can bring such an action.