Thank you for that question; I think it's a good question.
I can speak to you about what happened in the cedar shakes and shingles dispute. In that dispute, not only did the Shake and Shingle Alliance hire counsel, but we also ensured that we had our own private sector U.S. counsel there to assist them, to help them, to, essentially, back them up in that court case. We were successful in getting Commerce to reverse itself and find that cedar shakes and shingles were outside of the scope of the dispute.
In terms of remanufactured products more generally, the practice has varied and, unfortunately, the decision regarding what is in the scope and what is out of the scope is the U.S. Department of Commerce's alone. I will add, though, that under the 2006 softwood lumber agreement, we were able to successfully negotiate a carve-out for remanufacturers such that the duties that they paid on their remanufactured products were based on the lumber inputs they originally had. Certainly, if there are negotiations going forward, that's something that we can look at.