Thank you.
Let me punch into the numbers a little more directly now. We talk about the extra money that's being spent here—or less money that's been spent in some cases.
The clean growth program in Natural Resources for sector innovation is down by $10 million to $28 million in this set of estimates, and the contribution to support expanding market opportunities is up by $17 million.
Tie that in with what's happening with the liquefied natural gas sector on the west coast of Canada, where we used to have over 20 projects vying for export opportunities around the world. They competed with, obviously, opportunities elsewhere in the world, and now that's down to two that are in process right now.
Recently, as you know, Woodside finally pulled out of its joint venture with Chevron, so Kitimat LNG is not proceeding as well. That's another big loss for the country.
How does putting more government money in to replace the private sector money, which is, obviously, leaving for a reason...? I will note that large organizations—and Woodside is not a large organization—do not put $3 billion into a project in a foreign country and then walk away without something having changed as a result of macroeconomic factors. Those macroeconomic factors are not external; they are in Canada.
Please explain that for me.