I'll start, and Kate can add to it if I miss anything.
I think right now it's a bit early to tell, as there is still a lot of detail to be worked out. Our most initial focus, to go back to my original point, has been to avoid unnecessary duplication. We're an industry that's very comfortable with laws and regulation, let me tell you that. We're very heavily regulated. I think especially in an economic downturn, where the tolerance and the patience for that...is when you start seeing duplication that's driving no human health or environmental benefit.
One of the pieces we're working on in the clean fuel standard right now is related to buffer zones. There is currently a requirement that if your biomass is to be included—I can't remember if the buffer's 25 metres—there is a buffer zone around bodies of water that the federal standard, in draft, has specified. Well, every body of water is different. This goes back to local planning and local science. To make a judgment call that 25 metres or 30 metres needs to be the buffer for every body of water across Canada is ridiculous. We've been working with CCC officials and they've been open to that conversation, but those are the kinds of things....
The clean fuel standard can drive a lot of benefit on the bioeconomy side for a number of our pulp mills, getting into that biofuel space, but the regulations need to be drafted in a way that we're not tripping over existing provincial requirements.