Since I'm generous, I already told you a bit about what I would be discussing before the meeting started.
The Minister of the Environment said that, by 2023, we'll see an end to ineffective subsidies. I'm still wondering about what constitutes an effective subsidy in terms of oil. However, one helpful indicator is the energy return rate. This rate shows that blue hydrogen has an index of four. If we take the hydroelectricity products, meaning what we invest compared to what we receive in terms of energy, we have an index of 100. To me, that's a fairly big step.
On that note, do you find that your hydrogen strategy, which doesn't clearly set a carbon target, is an example of effective subsidies?