Thank you. We'll follow up with a proponent to try to get some accountability to Canadian taxpayers for this boondoggle caused by Prime Minister Trudeau and these Liberals, because, of course, they put at risk the already-approved Trans Mountain expansion when they delayed that review and dithered and forced them to go through a review again, and then green-lighted it. Then a court decision gave basically the same analysis on their failure on indigenous consultation, as was given in the northern gateway pipeline that the Prime Minister unilaterally vetoed himself.
Would it be safe to say the costs would have been lower, given government-caused inflation and the escalating costs of essentials like energy and the components of construction? Would it be safe to say that the private sector proponent likely would have committed to this project with much less expense to taxpayers because the private sector was making that investment and that risk?