Yes, I'll be happy to do that.
I was primarily referring to the regulations from both the utility and the regulator at the provincial or territorial level, and with respect to smaller, off-grid, rural and remote projects. In many cases, it concerns rate and rate inflexibility. What we found in many cases was that the proponent at the local level—a municipal government, in some cases, or a first nation—takes on the bulk of the risk if there is an issue with overall cost. We have seen some flexibility with rates in other kinds of technologies, but for renewables, we found this to be a challenge in many of our projects.
Basically, what I was referring to is this: In most cases, the regulator and the utility are still very much providing oversight on these projects, so the ability to have a viable project has to fit within those regulations. In other sectors, we've seen more flexibility that allows projects to proceed. I think there's some more work that needs to be done—primarily at the provincial and territorial levels—when it comes to regulators and utilities for rural and remote projects.