I think I'd focus on two specific pieces. First, I completely agree about the ITCs. The idea of the federal government coming in and helping fund this is about ensuring that our progressive tax system can help support the build-out of these resources. It will ensure greater equity across the board. It will not be asking the lowest-income families to bear the cost of the build-out that's required. It will actually be using progressive taxation to do so. ITCs are an incredibly important tool to put into place as quickly as possible.
Another specific example would be the SREP program, as mentioned earlier. That could be retooled to focus on demand management more directly. It could help unlock the distribution-level things that add the lowest-cost perspective, energy efficiency and distributed resources. This is really a conversation that we're very nascent in and very behind in when it comes to Canada. In Ontario, with the IESO, they've stood up one of the largest and one of the first pilots of this. They now have the ability to pull the equivalent of Kingston, Ontario, off the grid during a peak event. It's 90 megawatts. They can reduce that peak when they are seeing that climb.
Those sorts of tools are the ones that we need to be building our grid to optimize if we're really concerned about cost. I think those are two instruments that the federal government should be prioritizing.