Sure. You've mentioned a couple of things.
One is that I think energy development has to be taken in the context of everything else, of which climate is one, security is another, economic growth is another and future generations is another. Sometimes I also think our focus on climate obscures some of these other questions to us, things we might be paying attention to, including the one about energy poverty among the world's poor.
It strikes a lot of those I talk to as just another form of neo-colonialism. Given that we've just had indigenous reconciliation day, I think it's something we should think about. This appears to be yet another attempt to stop them from developing in the way that they deem, and it's leading to a lot of resentment. Economic growth is what leads people to care about increasingly green policies. Rich people care about these things. Poor people, the evidence indicates, do not.
That's one, but there are many ways in which we should be thinking about this globally. I've mentioned the Americans, who are unpredictable at best, but we also used to have a very independent capacity in international affairs. Canada was called a middle power. We won a Nobel Peace Prize for introducing the concept of peacekeeping. We had independent values that we stood for and that the world saw. One of them is the clean provision of energy and others that might hearken back to...I wouldn't say the good old days, but it's at least something that I think is worth remembering.
Those are a couple of comments. It's a very big canvas you've opened up, but I'll start with those.