There are a couple of things that are critical about that question.
You're absolutely right. The bulk of the world's chunk of economic growth and energy growth is going to come from that region, and that's going to be true for the next several decades. There is a strong case for why we should be getting Canadian oil and gas to tidewater. It's a shorter route, and it's cheaper from that, and it's less expensive to liquefy the natural gas. There are all kinds of reasons, economically speaking.
Geopolitically speaking, I think it'd be better to widen their supplier base. What I'm noticing right now in the case of Russia is their economy is actually rebounding very strongly, even after all the sanctions western countries have put on them because of the Ukraine war. They're doing that primarily by selling oil and gas to the Indo-Pacific region, roughly from India all the way to China. That is collecting, in them, an infrastructure network that binds them ever more closer to Russia. Geopolitically, that's a mistake.
You can view oil and gas and resource development as a bridge to a new region. Canadians have always been known for resource development, and that's always what we've been thought of as. We've been working very hard for decades to say that we do other things too, but nobody ever quite believes us. One of the things we should perhaps do as we develop more advanced technology in oil and gas is sell it to that region. The technologies we develop will be our linchpin for the higher value-added stuff, and hopefully our green technologies can then be used so that their oil and gas and use can be sold and developed in a way that's cognizant of Canadian values.