Naming witnesses in a motion is a practice we've followed before. In fact, we used it this summer in the case of the thorny issue of caribou. We wanted to hear from Boisaco, which was named directly in the motion. However, I understand what Ms. Dabrusin is saying.
If we agree to hold additional meetings, we could meet the demands of all members. In my case, it would be the Parliamentary Budget Officer, and in Mr. Boulerice's case, the Tsawout First Nation. The same goes for Ms. Stubbs and the witness she named in her motion. We could agree to hold two additional meetings, knowing that we could also discuss it in subcommittee. Maybe we could find a way to break the deadlock and get this done quickly.