So I understand that, in effect, you were consulted pro forma, without really listening to the point of view you had to put forward.
You said that you commissioned independent analyses. If possible, I'd like you to submit them to the committee. It might be interesting for our analysts.
You also said something that piqued my interest. You suggested that, ultimately, the government's willingness to cede or transfer the pipeline in any way to first nations was perhaps a sign of reconciliation. In fact, you think it would be a poisoned chalice, since we know very well that you will then have to manage all the problems related to potential spills. In the end, what you're being left with is a pipeline that isn't profitable.
Do you accept that analysis?