I appreciate everything that Mr. Angus added into it. I was just telling him I recently watched a documentary about the history of his community. I think it was called Blooms. He can correct me if I got that wrong. It was really interesting, so I appreciate that.
I think I stated at the outset what my reasoning was behind it and why Alberta was singled out in the bottom part of the motion. The actual motion study is about the federal funds that have not been used by the province to clean up these orphan wells, although, as I mentioned in the outset, Saskatchewan used all the funds.
That said, that was the reasoning for the different wording in the motion, but I'm okay, actually, with the proposal that was put forward by Mr. Simard. I think that all of that still forms part of the study.
If I can provide an assurance to Mr. Angus—and I don't know if the chair has any updates—I would never expect this to bump the appearances of ministers on the TMX study. I don't know if we need anything to be more clear about that, but that's certainly not my intention.