Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I tend to agree, but I would like to propose minor changes to Ms. Dabrusin's motion.
It's mostly the last paragraph. I think the direct reference to Alberta should be removed. The motion says “this failure to clean these wells in Alberta”, but we could talk about wells in general.
I would also add the word “federal” to clarify that we're talking about federal regulations. As you know, protecting provincial jurisdictions is kind of my hobby horse.
Therefore, I would like the study to focus on federal regulations and all wells, not just ones in Alberta. I think these small changes would clarify the intent of the motion. I don't think they in any way change what my fellow member Ms. Dabrusin is trying to do.
Is the amendment I'm proposing clear to the clerk?