Yes. I would say, Mr. Falk, that some elements of the contracts would have been fixed—primarily materials that they would have bought early in the project. With respect to the rest of the work, it was largely time and material. It was driven by the amount of work that would have been encountered.
One of the big changes that would have been an element of this—and this has been commented on by both gentlemen—is the use of, effectively, poor-boy construction techniques. What that means in pipeline parlance is basically that we don't get the economies of scale from continuous cross-country pipelining like you might see in eastern Alberta, Saskatchewan or Manitoba.
Instead, it was having to build, pick up, move, build, go back, fill in, pick up and move, so efficiencies were never realized—