There are really a few points to make here. One is the importance.... Canada did step in on a project that otherwise, probably, would not have gone forward. I think that's important to recognize. There are great benefits to the country as a result of that. Again, on the private sector, it would have been good if they were there. They were not, unfortunately, at the time, so Canada did something that was really important. I want to comment on that.
With respect to other major projects and the execution of major projects, whatever it is—power lines, ammonia pipelines, hydrogen transport—all of that is going to need.... We have to find a way to get big infrastructure done in this country more efficiently. Otherwise, we're not going to be competitive.
You can look at the recent IEA study. In there, there is a lot of commentary on the reasons to be optimistic about the future, and there are a whole bunch of reasons to be pessimistic about the future. One of them is where the concentration of rare earths and the production for the technologies for the transition are. They're not here in Canada or North America at all. We have a lot of work to do there to support big infrastructure development, especially on the power side.
Hopefully, that catches the spirit of your question.