I have a point of order.
In the first case, I don't believe I've heard a motion from the members opposite seeking to amend the motion we have here. They've just been talking a blue streak for a very long time. I guess it's about the witness list they would like.
That would be my first piece.
Also, I'm curious as to whether they're taking the position that we should not be studying the impact of these orphaned wells. That seems to be something that's up in the air.