No problem. Thank you for sending it over.
Monsieur Simard, you should have a copy of it. Hopefully it has been translated well. I'm sure it has been.
Upon further review and discussions with the clerk, based on the reading of the book on page 541, the motion is inadmissible. As for the amendment, the book states:
...it is irrelevant to the main motion (i.e., it deals with a matter foreign to the main motion, exceeds its scope, or introduces a new proposition which should properly be the subject of a separate substantive motion with notice);
Based on my review, the motion is unfortunately inadmissible, so we will go back to the main motion as amended, which we previously had on the floor.
Mrs. Goodridge still has the floor.
I hope that clarifies things. I apologize for taking everybody's time, because it took some time to make sure that we had the appropriate translation for members, and then this arose as well.
That's the decision we've made.