I'm going to address Mr. Simard's point of order. I apologize, but I have to wait for interpretation to hear your point of order because I can't hear it, even though the interpreters are doing a tremendous job.
Once again, Mr. Simard, on your point of order about getting back to the motion, I think it's partly a point of clarification. Through a point of order, you were saying that there was an amendment brought forward that changed the motion—and I'm summarizing, just to make sure Ms. Goodridge knows that it's broader and not just an Alberta initiative. Thank you for providing that clarification, but it's not a point of order.
I just want to let you know as well that I think Ms. Goodridge has a copy of the new amended motion, I believe, or should have it. If not, we can make sure she gets it.
Now, you have a—