Well, yes, and my hesitation is only because there are a couple of layers that were overseeing the project. The Trans Mountain board and management built a pretty significant project management team, and throughout the life of the project, especially at points of cost increases, there was quite a dialogue between government and Trans Mountain. There was a special third party committee created by the Trans Mountain board to challenge and test at that level the plans and the progress to see if there were any efficiencies to be gained all the way along. That happened again when it came into government to approve revised corporate plans and borrowing plans that enabled the increased borrowing to finish the pipeline. Treasury Board took quite a long look and challenged on efficiencies and whether there was any more optimization possible and really just to understand the drivers of the costs.
Does that answer your question?