Thank you.
As I started to say, the oil and gas emissions gap is part of a broad approach to addressing the climate issue in a manner that actually will create jobs and economic opportunity. No sector gets a pass if you actually believe that the science of climate change is real. I think 99.9% of scientists do, even if Danielle Smith's party does not.
At the end of the day, oil and gas represent 31% of emissions in this country. It must begin to go down, just as transportation, electricity and everything else. If you are thoughtful about this—not backward-looking from an economic perspective, but forward-looking from an economic perspective—you look to see how you can actually extract value from that. Decarbonized oil and gas is going to have value in a world that is moving towards low carbon and many new products, like low-carbon hydrogen and a range of other things are going to have markets that will be there for people who actually are thoughtful about moving forward.
At the end of the day, we see this very much in Europe, which is continuing its transition toward a low-carbon future. That is why it is coming to countries like Canada for critical minerals, for hydrogen and for a range of other things. It is important for us to respect the science of climate change and also to look to seize the economic opportunities of the future.