Ms. Freeland, I note some obvious inconsistencies in what you said before. In large international forums, the expectation is that oil consumption will decline over the next 50 years. In principle, for your pipeline to be profitable, oil consumption will have to intensify. So that is already an inconsistency as to the pipeline's profitability.
The second inconsistency is the following. I have heard your colleague Mr. Guilbeault say on numerous occasions that he wants to put an end to fossil fuel subsidies. It seems that you have found a new way of supporting fossil fuels directly through the Canada Growth Fund. So it seems that your interest in ending fossil fuel subsidies is not as strong as what I have heard from Mr. Guilbeault.
I have a very simple question for you: Do you consider support for Pathways Alliance to be a type of fossil fuel subsidy?