Thank you.
I can hear the members opposite choosing to chirp a little bit about my questions. I find that interesting. I will just say that I'm trying to clarify what was in the report and what the pieces were. I believe that's something everyone here has had a chance to speak to.
I know that when we were talking as well, you talked about not factoring in benefits. Perhaps we can talk a little bit about what exactly goes into the scope of your study. For example, some of the witnesses we have heard today talked about how there was a difference in the contracts for workers on these pipelines. Before it was purchased by the government, they were not union jobs. Then they did become union jobs.
In all the valuations you do, do you include such things as those kind of benefits to workers, particularly in Alberta?