As some MPs—yourself included—have mentioned, this could certainly be seen as contradictory. On the one hand, there's a desire to cap emissions from the oil and gas sector and commit to a net-zero economy by 2050—some countries are aiming for 2060. On the other hand, we're told that a pipeline will facilitate the export of petroleum products and increase the price at which producers can sell them. All that's based on the expectation that a profit will be made on the sale of this pipeline. So a lot of things can be seen as contradictory.
This leads us to believe that the sale price will probably result in a financial loss for the government, given the context and environment in which the future purchaser of the pipeline will have to operate. In that environment, emissions from the oil and gas sector will be limited for entirely desirable public policy reasons—that's what the government wants. So it cannot simultaneously be said that the pipeline will have significant value. It does, but it may not be as high as expected.