No. In fact, we didn't go for a net present value because it would have had to also assume future costs of construction. Now that the construction is over and the pipeline is in operation, the costs to acquire and expand the pipeline are known, so we can rely on historical factors. Given that the pipeline is in operation, some of these costs can start to be amortized as part of the ongoing operations.
That's why we decided to go with what we thought was more appropriate in a future flows analysis. It's what an acquirer could expect to get in future revenues from the pipeline. They can do the simple calculation of looking at what is on the books in terms of assets and liabilities because it's known how much the pipeline cost to acquire and to expand.
We don't need to do a net present value of these costs because they're in the past, and some of these have already started to be written off, as I said, or amortized over the expected lifetime of the pipeline.
It's not at all a judgment that anything will be erased from the books or written off.