I want to follow up on what Mr. Dreeshen just said. I may have misunderstood the clerk's answer. It's not the interpretation's fault, I may have misheard. So I ask the following question so I can understand better.
The purpose of this motion is to have the matter of the Parliamentary Budget Officer's report and the Trans Mountain Pipeline debated in the House. If we apply Standing Order 109, I understand that it won't be debated in the House, because we'll have to wait for a written response from the government. So that would go against the spirit of the motion. Do I understand correctly, Mr. Clerk?