Thank you for providing that clarification, Mr. Chair.
Again, I'm going to repeat that this is about ensuring that the witnesses we brought forward who had expertise on a number of fronts be included and that the report be before us when we go to the House.
Some of the witnesses spoke to us about the economic, safety and indigenous community impacts as well. I would suggest that when we, as a committee, all agreed to take on this study, what we wanted was to hold the government to account. The report will provide that more complete and thorough review with all of the witnesses' testimony, as well as the recommendations that may ensue from that report.
The final point that I will make—and I know that my colleague MP Dabrusin made it, but I think it's important because I did start by saying that process is important—is that every report this committee has made since the beginning of this session required the Government of Canada to table the reports. It is the accepted process that has been adopted by this committee and other committees. The reports that we've seen where this occurred include the report on the climate crisis in Canada's energy sector. There are a number of reports that we know of, such as the report on the fair and equitable energy transformation, and there are many others.
I would conclude by saying that in terms of process, I think it is important that we follow that due process. In terms of accountability and in terms of ensuring a good and complete debate, I think it is important that we do that with the full range of witnesses and testimony that we heard.
Thank you, Mr. Chair.